Philosophy of Neuroscience

Philosophy of Neuroscience
Ramón y Cajal Retina

Sunday, May 11, 2014

Three Basic Neuroscientific Postulates about Consciousness


According to the widely accepted commentary-key paradigm for the definition of the concept of consciousness proposed by Lawrence Weiskrantz [1997], subjective reports are the primary criterion for deciding whether a percept is conscious or not. The proposal is akin to the accurate report concept of  Seth, Baars and Edelman [2005]. The reports do not have to be verbal, in fact, many neuroimaging experiments are based on manual reports of conscious perception [Dehaene, 2006]. In any case, the paradigm assumes attention as a key property of consciousness, for it would not make any sense a non-attentional report. However, the proposition “there is consciousness iff there is attention” is not subscribed by some neuroscientist, for subjects can become conscious of an isolated object or the gist of a scene despite the near absence of top-down attention, and, conversely, subjects can attend to perceptually invisible objects [Koch and Tsuchiya, 2006].
Such domain for the concept of consciousness has been neurophysiologically characterized by 3 postulates [Seth, Baars and Edelman, 2005]:
1.      The EEG signature of consciousness. LaBerge[2006]: Synchronous activity in clusters of apical dendrites produces electromagnetic (EM) fields that can radiate outward, and if they are strong enough to reach the surface of the scalp they can be measured as EEGs. The electromagnetic field has been proposed as the physical substrate of consciousness by McFadden [2000] and Pockett [2000]. According to these investigators it is the overall field pattern within the brain formed by all of these individual fields that constitutes momentary consciousness.
2.      The dependence of consciousness on the thalamocortical complex. There are different neural-based theories which have postulated the link of consciousness to the thalamocortical circuitry, such as Llinas y Pare [1997], Bogen [1995], Baars[2003], Tononi and Edelman[1998] etc. Furthermore LaBerge [2005]had proposed that the stability of the cognitive processes of consciousness (sustained attention, imagery, and working memory) are possible due to the stabilization produced by apical dendrite activity in pyramidal neurons within recurrent corticothalamic circuits, and that the wave activities of apical dendrites that stabilize the ongoing activity constitute the subjective impressions of an attended object and the entire sensory background.
3.      The widespread brain activity in consciousness. While unconsciousness is local, consciousness is a widespread neural activity, as it is shown by several (two dozen) neuroscientific experiments [Seth, Baars and Edelman, 2005].


References


Baars, B. J., Banks, W. P., & Newman, J. (Eds.). (2003). Essential sources in the scientific study of consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bogen, J. E. (1995). On the neurophysiology of consciousness. I. An overview. Consciousness and Cognition, 4, 52–62.
Dehaene, Stanislas; Changeux, Jean-Pierre; Naccache1, Lionel; Sackur, Jerome,
and Sergent, Claire. [2006] Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.5 May 2006.
Koch, Kristog, and Tsuchiya, Naotsugu. [2006] Attention and consciousness: two distinct brain processes. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.11 No.1
Laberge, David.[2005] Sustained attention and apical dendrite activity in recurrent circuits. Brain Research Reviews 50 (2005) 86 – 99.
Laberge, David.[2006] Apical dendrite activity in cognition and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 15 (2006) 235–257.
Llinas, R. R., & Pare, D. [1997]. Coherent oscillations in specific and non-specific thalamocortical networks and their role in cognition. In M. Steriade, E. G. Jones, & McCormick D.A. (Eds.). Thalamus (experimental and clinical aspects) (Vol. 2, pp. 501–516). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
McFadden, J. [2000]. Quantum evolution. London: Harper–Collins.
Pockett, S. [2000]. The nature of consciousness: A hypothesis. Lincoln, NE: Writers Club Press.
Seth, Anil K.; Baars,  Bernard, J. and Edelman, David B. [2005]. Criteria for consciousness in humans and other mammals. Consciousness and Cognition 14 (2005) 119–139.
Tonomi, G., & Edelman, G. M. (1998). Consciousness and complexity. Science, 282, 1846–1851.
Weiskrantz, L. [1997] Consciousness Lost and Found: A Neuropsychological Exploration, Oxford University Press.